Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emily Appleton vs Olivia Nicholls Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Appleton vs Nicholls analysis and find out who is favored!
Emily Appleton vs Olivia Nicholls Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Appleton 0 - 0 Nicholls
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Appleton has won 47.23% of points on their second serve, while Nicholls has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Appleton, in recent form, has won 52.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nicholls has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.48% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Appleton has saved 52.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nicholls has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Appleton has won 53.97% of matches played (W/L 34/ 29), with Nicholls winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Appleton has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 43/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/ 15). Nicholls has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 17/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Appleton has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.17% of matches (W/L 32/ 26), where as Nicholls has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Appleton has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.52 while Nicholls has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Appleton has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nicholls has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Appleton has converted 39.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nicholls has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
399
Rank
368
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
50% (181-179)
Career Total W/L
45% (32-39)
56% (18-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,804
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emily Appleton | Olivia Nicholls |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (18/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (37/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (325/320) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.63 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 198 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.61 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 192 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 275.88 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1174/2046) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (824/1174) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (406/872) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (93/241) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (907/2187) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (18/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (18/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (15/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (15/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (17/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Emily Appleton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Elena Pridankina
Player
Emily Appleton
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Flores
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
35 of
78)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Emily Appleton
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Katherine Sebov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
7
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Kyle S. Mcphillips
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Naima Karamoko
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
7
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Emily Appleton
82%
(
60 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Noelia Manta
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Olivia Nicholls Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shuyue Ma
Player
Olivia Nicholls
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Hiroko Kuwata
Player
Olivia Nicholls
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
35 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Appleton Vs Nicholls Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
